Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Helio G91 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Helio G91
22.6Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
20CPU30.7
27.1GPU—
20Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G912 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G91

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 20
  • 20% higher Max clock: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz

General

General comparison: MediaTek Helio G91 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G91Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20242026
Process12 nm—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G91 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G91Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2 GHz2.4 GHz+20%

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G91 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G91Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G52 MC2Mali-G68
GPU clock1,000 MHz—

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Helio G91 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G91Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-3600—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Helio G91 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G91Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 4G LTE (Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Helio G91 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G91Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 90Hz—
Video capture2K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Helio G91 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Helio G91Samsung Exynos 1610
Geekbench 6 (single)413Bottom 12%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,402Bottom 15%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme188Bottom 2%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup