Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs Unisoc T610

MediaTek Helio G92 Max
20Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Unisoc T610
20.6Inno Score
20CPU20
20GPU21.6
20Efficiencyspec-based20
5 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G92 Max0 spec wins — Unisoc T610

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: MediaTek Helio G92 Max scores 20 against 20.6 for Unisoc T610. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Unisoc T610 edges ahead in GPU, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G92 Max

  • 41% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 190 vs 135
  • 11% higher Max clock: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: MediaTek Helio G92 Max versus Unisoc T610
SpecMediaTek Helio G92 MaxUnisoc T610
Announced20242021
Process12 nm12 nm
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G92 Max versus Unisoc T610
SpecMediaTek Helio G92 MaxUnisoc T610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A552x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2 GHz+11%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G92 Max versus Unisoc T610
SpecMediaTek Helio G92 MaxUnisoc T610
GPUArm Mali-G52 MC2Arm Mali-G52 MP2
GPU clock—614 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Helio G92 Max versus Unisoc T610
SpecMediaTek Helio G92 MaxUnisoc T610
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1600 / LPDDR3-933

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Helio G92 Max versus Unisoc T610
SpecMediaTek Helio G92 MaxUnisoc T610
Modem4G LTEIntegrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.0

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Helio G92 Max versus Unisoc T610
SpecMediaTek Helio G92 MaxUnisoc T610
Max display—FHD+ (2400x1080)
Video capture—1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Helio G92 Max versus Unisoc T610
SpecMediaTek Helio G92 MaxUnisoc T610
Geekbench 6 (single)445+7%Bottom 18%417Bottom 13%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,398+3%Bottom 14%1,361Bottom 13%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme190+41%Bottom 10%135Bottom 5%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup