Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
22.1CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
23.7Benchmarks71.2
54.9Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6807 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 30.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+48) and CPU (+30). Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 24
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 55
- 560% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 290,000
- 412% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 420
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+44% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X11 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 90Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 290,000Top 82% | 1,914,857+560%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 420Top 84% | 2,150+412%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,400Top 85% | 6,600+371%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680vs MediaTek Dimensity 700VSQualcomm Snapdragon 680vs Huawei Kirin 980VSQualcomm Snapdragon 680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845VSQualcomm Snapdragon 680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
