Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
24.3CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
36Benchmarks71.2
54.9Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 68510 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 34.9, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+35) and CPU (+27). Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 24
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 55
- 1803% higher AnTuTu 10 (GPU): 562,338 vs 29,548
- 357% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 470
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+44% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X11 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 90Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 471,425Top 63% | 1,914,857+306%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 470Top 82% | 2,150+357%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,500Top 83% | 6,600+340%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 185,372Top 100% | 637,914+244%Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 29,548Top 100% | 562,338+1803%Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 128,755Top 98% | 289,405+125%Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 127,750Top 100% | 425,200+233%Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Apple A12 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
