Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
31.4CPU51.7
27.3GPU49.4
49.1Benchmarks71.2
32.1Efficiency66.5
0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 86013 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 34.3, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+34) and benchmarks (+22). Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 32
- 373% higher AnTuTu 10 (GPU): 562,338 vs 118,830
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 10 W | 9 W+10% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.96 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.96 GHz | 3.2 GHz+8% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 640 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 700 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 690 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X15 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 795,334Top 42% | 1,914,857+141%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 870Top 62% | 2,150+147%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,900Top 46% | 6,600+128%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 830Top 83% | 3,800+358%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 294,736Top 75% | 637,914+116%Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 118,830Top 78% | 562,338+373%Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 160,316Top 69% | 289,405+81%Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 221,452Top 80% | 425,200+92%Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860vs Apple A12 BionicVSQualcomm Snapdragon 860vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSQualcomm Snapdragon 860vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSQualcomm Snapdragon 860vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
