Qualcomm Snapdragon C vs Samsung Exynos 2400
30.7CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
—Benchmarks71.2
39.4Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 33.6, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+27) and CPU (+21). Qualcomm Snapdragon C still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 39
- 50% lower process: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 33% higher Max clock: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2023 |
| Process | 8 nm | 4 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARMv8-A | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x 2.4 GHz Kryo 468 Gold + 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 468 Silver | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X15 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 0.8 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 2560x1440 | — |
| Video capture | 4K at 30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | — | 1,914,857Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,600Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs Unisoc Tiger T760VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

