Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
30.7CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
—Benchmarks71.2
—Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16102 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 31
- 33% higher Max clock: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2023 |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2 + 6 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1610 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,914,857Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 45% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,150Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,600Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 25% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Samsung Exynos 1680VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS
