Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

S
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2500
66.1Inno Score
30.7CPU57.2
—GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
—Efficiencyspec-based79.6
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16102 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500

  • Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 31
  • 38% higher Max clock: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
Announced20262025
Process—3 nm
TDP (typical)—8 W
Architecture—Armv9.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
Cores810+25%
Core configuration2 + 61x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
Max clock2.4 GHz3.3 GHz+38%

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
GPUMali-G68Samsung Xclipse 950

AI

AI comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
NPU—Samsung NPU
AI performance—59 TOPS

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
Memory type—LPDDR5X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
Modem—Integrated Exynos 5G modem
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth5.3—

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
Video capture—8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Samsung Exynos 2500
AnTuTu—2,150,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,300Top 14%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,200Top 10%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,400Top 20%

Related comparisons

Samsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Samsung Exynos 1680VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVS

Try another matchup