Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Unisoc T610

S
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T610
20.6Inno Score
27.3CPU20
—GPU21.6
—Efficiencyspec-based20
4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16100 spec wins — Unisoc T610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 27 vs 20
  • 129% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 953 vs 417
  • 58% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,144 vs 1,361
  • 33% higher Max clock: 2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T610
Announced20262021
Process—12 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T610
Cores88
Core configuration2 + 62x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+33%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T610
GPUMali-G68Arm Mali-G52 MP2
GPU clock—614 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T610
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1600 / LPDDR3-933

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T610
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.0

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T610
Max display—FHD+ (2400x1080)
Video capture—1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T610
Geekbench 6 (single)953+129%Bottom 43%417Bottom 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,144+58%Bottom 37%1,361Bottom 13%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—135Bottom 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup