Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Unisoc T7300

S
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
30.7CPU25.3
—GPU65
—Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16100 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 and Unisoc T7300 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 25

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T7300
Announced20262025
Process—6 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration2 + 62x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+9%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T7300
GPUMali-G68Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T7300
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T7300
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.35.4

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc T7300
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Related comparisons

Try another matchup