Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Unisoc Tiger T820

S
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc Tiger T820
35.6Inno Score
30.7CPU27
—Benchmarks35.9
—Efficiencyspec-based52.5
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16101 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 27

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820

  • 13% higher Max clock: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T820
Announced20262023
Process—6 nm
TDP (typical)—6 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T820
Cores88
Core configuration2 + 61x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz2.7 GHz+13%

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T820
GPUMali-G68Arm Mali-G57 MP4

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T820
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T820
Modem—Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T820
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T820
AnTuTu—470,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—690Top 77%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,250Top 61%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup