Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
38.7CPU51.7
40.8GPU49.4
62.7Benchmarks71.2
56.5AIspec-based—
68Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16805 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 50.2, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+13) and GPU (+9). Samsung Exynos 1680 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 63
- 118% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 1,742
- 56% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 1,376
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 550 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 1,200 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 20 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.1 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,363,464 | 1,914,857Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 45% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,376Top 35% | 2,150+56%Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,411Top 29% | 6,600+50%Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,742Top 62% | 3,800+118%Top 25% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS

