Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
34.3CPU57.9
31GPU54
48.7Benchmarks73.1
0AI85.9
66.5Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 22009 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+86) and benchmarks (+24). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 67
- 110% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 2,100
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 8 W+11% |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+18% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,100,000 | 2,150,000+95% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600 | 2,300+44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150 | 8,200+98% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,100 | 4,400+110% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Google Tensor G3VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

