Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
39.3CPU28
35.5GPU—
57.3Benchmarks—
66.5Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 22000 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 28
- 60% lower process: 4 nm vs 10 nm
- 22% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2018 |
| Process | 4 nm+60% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+22% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | — | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,100,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150Top 32% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,100Top 43% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS

