Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc T616
39.3CPU20.1
35.5GPU23.6
57.3Benchmarks—
66.5Efficiencyspec-based20
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 22000 spec wins — Unisoc T616
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 21.3, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+19) and GPU (+12). Unisoc T616 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 20
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 24
- 1515% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,100 vs 130
- 268% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 435
- 167% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,150 vs 1,553
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T616
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | — | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,100,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600+268%Top 25% | 435Bottom 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150+167%Top 32% | 1,553Bottom 17% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,100+1515%Top 43% | 130Bottom 2% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSUnisoc T616vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678VSUnisoc T616vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020VSUnisoc T616vs Unisoc T610VSUnisoc T616vs Unisoc T620VS
