Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
51.7CPU21.6
49.4GPU—
71.2Benchmarks20
66.5Efficiency44.2
7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+51) and CPU (+30). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 44
- 791% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 215,000
- 514% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 350
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2019 |
| Process | 4 nm+60% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 5 W+44% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,914,857+791%Top 12% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150+514%Top 16% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600+428%Top 15% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 637,914Top 26% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 562,338Top 29% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 289,405Top 40% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 425,200Top 29% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS
