Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Unisoc T7225
51.7CPU20
49.4GPU35
71.2Benchmarks—
66.5Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24001 spec wins — Unisoc T7225
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7225 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 20
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 35
- 78% higher Max clock: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 67% lower process: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz+78% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | — | 650 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1600 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,914,857Top 34% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 637,914Top 31% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 562,338Top 34% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 289,405Top 43% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 425,200Top 34% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150Top 17% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600Top 16% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 23% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSUnisoc T7225vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G81VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G91VSUnisoc T7225vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS