Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Unisoc Tiger T760
51.7CPU22.8
49.4GPU—
71.2Benchmarks33.1
66.5Efficiency54.9
7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 33.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+38) and CPU (+29). Unisoc Tiger T760 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 23
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 55
- 356% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 420,000
- 258% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 600
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 5 W+44% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz+45% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T760 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,914,857+356%Top 12% | 420,000Top 70% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150+258%Top 16% | 600Top 76% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600+247%Top 15% | 1,900Top 72% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 637,914Top 26% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 562,338Top 29% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 289,405Top 40% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 425,200Top 29% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs Qualcomm Snapdragon CVSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSUnisoc Tiger T760vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS