Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Unisoc T8200
51.7CPU28
49.4GPU55
71.2Benchmarks—
66.5Efficiencyspec-based36
3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24001 spec wins — Unisoc T8200
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 28
- 39% higher Max clock: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 33% lower process: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200
- Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 49
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | — | 850 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated 5G (SA/NSA) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional) |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,914,857Top 36% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 637,914Top 34% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 562,338Top 36% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 289,405Top 47% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 425,200Top 36% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150Top 18% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600Top 17% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 25% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSUnisoc T8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSUnisoc T8200vs Huawei Kirin 8020VSUnisoc T8200vs MediaTek Helio G200VSUnisoc T8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4VS