Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Xiaomi XRING O1
51.7CPU66.2
49.4GPU69.9
71.2Benchmarks—
—AIspec-based78.1
66.5Efficiencyspec-based84
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24006 spec wins — Xiaomi XRING O1
InnoReviews verdict
Xiaomi XRING O1 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 72.2 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+21) and CPU (+15). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi XRING O1
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 70 vs 49
- 66% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,311 vs 3,800
- 36% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,970 vs 6,600
- 30% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,790 vs 2,150
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x3.9 GHz Cortex-X925 + 4x3.4 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.9 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz+22% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC16 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Xiaomi NPU (6-core, self-developed) |
| AI performance | — | 44 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5T |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | External (MediaTek T800) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,914,857Top 34% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 637,914Top 31% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 562,338Top 34% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 289,405Top 43% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 425,200Top 34% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150Top 17% | 2,790+30%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600Top 16% | 8,970+36%Top 8% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 23% | 6,311+66%Top 8% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400+VSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500sVSXiaomi XRING O1vs Apple A19 ProVSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VS

