Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 9610
—Inno Score
72.6CPU28
77.4GPU—
81.1Benchmarks—
100Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 26000 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600

  • Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 28
  • 80% lower process: 2 nm vs 10 nm
  • 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
Announced20262018
Process2 nm+80%10 nm
ArchitectureArmv9.3Armv8

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
Cores10+25%8
Core configuration1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53
Max clock—2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
GPUSamsung Xclipse 960Arm Mali-G72 MP3

AI

AI comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
NPUSamsung NPU—

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
Memory type—LPDDR4X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-12
Max download—0.6 Gbps
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
Max display—WQXGA (2560x1600)
Video capture—4K@120fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 2600 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecSamsung Exynos 2600Samsung Exynos 9610
AnTuTu2,827,538Top 12%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)947,776Top 8%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)1,052,625Top 12%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)347,409Top 22%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)479,728Top 27%—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,995Top 8%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,824Top 5%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme7,230Top 7%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup