Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Unisoc T7225
72.6CPU20
77.4GPU35
81.1Benchmarks—
100Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 26000 spec wins — Unisoc T7225
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7225 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 20
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 35
- 83% lower process: 2 nm vs 12 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 2 nm+83% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | — | 650 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-1600 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz |
| Video capture | — | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,827,538Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 947,776Top 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,052,625Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,409Top 22% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 479,728Top 27% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,995Top 8% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,824Top 5% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230Top 7% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Xiaomi Xring O3VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSUnisoc T7225vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G81VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G91VSUnisoc T7225vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS