Samsung Exynos 850 vs Unisoc T618
20CPU20
20GPU25
—Benchmarks29.4
46.7Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 8501 spec wins — Unisoc T618
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T618 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 850
- 33% lower process: 8 nm vs 12 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T618
- Stronger GPU score: 25 vs 20
- 33% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 186 vs 140
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2019 |
| Process | 8 nm+33% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 4 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G52 MP1 | Arm Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU clock | — | 850 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | VDSP AI engine |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-1600 | LPDDR4X-1866 / LPDDR3-933 |
| Max bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | FHD+ (2400x1080) |
| Video capture | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 850 | Unisoc T618 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 363,589Bottom 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 146,141Bottom 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 29,495Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 74,532Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 113,421Bottom 5% |
| AnTuTu 12 | — | 426,608Bottom 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 170Bottom 3% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 600Bottom 2% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 140Bottom 10% | 186+33%Bottom 15% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 850vs Huawei Kirin 710VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665VSUnisoc T618vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665VSUnisoc T618vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc T618vs MediaTek Helio G80VSUnisoc T618vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662VS