Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Unisoc Tiger T820
21.6CPU27
20Benchmarks35.9
44.2Efficiency52.5
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96117 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Unisoc Tiger T820 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 35.6 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+16) and efficiency (+8). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 17% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 6 W
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- Stronger CPU score: 27 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 36 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 53 vs 44
- 119% higher AnTuTu 10: 470,000 vs 215,000
- 97% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 690 vs 350
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2023 |
| Process | 10 nm | 6 nm+40% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+17% | 6 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz+17% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-1866 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 GB/s | 17.1 GB/s+15% |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 9611 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 215,000Top 93% | 470,000+119%Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 350Top 89% | 690+97%Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,250Top 90% | 2,250+80%Top 59% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS