Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc T620

Unisoc Tiger T606
26.2Inno Score
VS
U
—Inno Score
20CPU25.3
—GPU55
20Benchmarks—
46.7Efficiencyspec-based20
0 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T6062 spec wins — Unisoc T620

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T620 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T606

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T620

  • Stronger CPU score: 25 vs 20
  • 38% higher Max clock: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz

General

General comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T620
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T620
Announced20212024
Process12 nm12 nm
TDP (typical)4 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T620
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T620
Cores88
Core configuration2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A552x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock1.6 GHz2.2 GHz+38%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T620
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T620
GPUArm Mali-G57 MP1Arm Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T620
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T620
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1866LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth14.9 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T620
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T620
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-7Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.2

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T620
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T620
Max displayFHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ @ 90Hz / HD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@30fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T620
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T620
AnTuTu235,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)390Bottom 11%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,400Bottom 14%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup