Skip to content
InnoReviews

AGM PAD P3 Compact vs POCO Pad C1

AGM PAD P3 Compact
38.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
POCO Pad C1
38.7Inno Score
32.7chipPerformancechip26.7
48.4Display55.4
24.1Battery27.9
52.5Portability74.4
44Features25.2
3 spec wins — AGM PAD P3 Compact5 spec wins — POCO Pad C1

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: AGM PAD P3 Compact scores 38.6 against 38.7 for POCO Pad C1. Pick by the categories that matter to you — POCO Pad C1 edges ahead in portability and display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the AGM PAD P3 Compact

  • Stronger performance score: 33 vs 27
  • Stronger features score: 44 vs 25
  • 525% higher Rear camera: 50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 60% higher Front camera: 8 MP vs 5 MP
  • 50% higher RAM: 6 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to pick the POCO Pad C1

  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 48
  • Stronger battery score: 28 vs 24
  • Stronger portability score: 74 vs 53
  • 49% lower thickness: 7.4 mm vs 14.5 mm
  • 39% higher Pixel density: 250 ppi vs 180 ppi

Display

Display comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus POCO Pad C1
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactPOCO Pad C1
Screen size8.7 ″9.7 ″+12%
Panel typeLCDIPS LCD
Resolution800 x 13402048x1280
Pixel density180 ppi250 ppi+39%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus POCO Pad C1
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactPOCO Pad C1
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G99Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
RAM6 GB+50%4 GB
Storage options128GB64GB / 128GB + microSD

Battery

Battery comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus POCO Pad C1
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactPOCO Pad C1
Capacity7,200 mAh7,600 mAh+6%
Charging18 W18 W

Design

Design comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus POCO Pad C1
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactPOCO Pad C1
Weight540 g406 g+25%
Thickness14.5 mm7.4 mm+49%
MaterialPolycarbonate + soft-touch rubberAluminum

Camera

Camera comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus POCO Pad C1
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactPOCO Pad C1
Rear camera50 MP+525%8 MP
Front camera8 MP+60%5 MP

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus POCO Pad C1
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactPOCO Pad C1
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.0
Cellular4G LTE, eSIMWi-Fi only
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0

Features

Features comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus POCO Pad C1
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactPOCO Pad C1
SpeakersStereo (dual box speakers)Dual stereo
Operating systemAndroid 16Android 16 (HyperOS 3)

Related comparisons

Try another matchup