Honor Pad X7b vs Teclast M60
27.4chipPerformancechip25.3
41.5Display48.6
36Battery36
66.6Portability43.2
22.8Features29.2
1 spec wins — Honor Pad X7b4 spec wins — Teclast M60
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Honor Pad X7b scores 35.9 against 35.6 for Teclast M60. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Honor Pad X7b edges ahead in portability and performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Honor Pad X7b
- Stronger portability score: 67 vs 43
- 25% lower weight: 449 g vs 600 g
Reasons to pick the Teclast M60
- Stronger display score: 49 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 29 vs 23
- 160% higher Rear camera: 13 MP vs 5 MP
- 50% higher RAM: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 23% higher Screen size: 12 ″ vs 9.7 ″
Display
| Spec | Honor Pad X7b | Teclast M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 9.7 ″ | 12 ″+23% |
| Panel type | LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 2052x1152 | 2000 x 1200 |
| Pixel density | 243 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | Honor Pad X7b | Teclast M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Unisoc T7250 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 128GB + expandable storage (up to 2TB) | 128GB |
Battery
| Spec | Honor Pad X7b | Teclast M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 8,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
Design
| Spec | Honor Pad X7b | Teclast M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 449 g+25% | 600 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8 mm+6% |
| Material | Aluminum unibody | — |
Camera
| Spec | Honor Pad X7b | Teclast M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 5 MP | 13 MP+160% |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
Connectivity
| Spec | Honor Pad X7b | Teclast M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Dual-band Wi-Fi (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Cellular | 4G LTE optional | Dual 4G LTE |
| USB | — | USB-C |
Features
| Spec | Honor Pad X7b | Teclast M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Speakers | — | Dual speakers |
| Operating system | Android 16 (MagicOS 10) | Android 17 |

