Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) vs Redmi Pad SE 8.7
VS
20Performance22.6
20Display37.6
31.7Battery22.1
20Portability68
31.2Features25.2
3 spec wins — Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)3 spec wins — Redmi Pad SE 8.7
InnoReviews verdict
Redmi Pad SE 8.7 wins this tablet face-off, 31.2 to 24, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+48) and display (+18). Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)
- Stronger battery score: 32 vs 22
- Stronger features score: 31 vs 25
- 79% higher Screen size: 15.6 ″ vs 8.7 ″
- 60% higher Front camera: 8 MP vs 5 MP
- 20% higher capacity: 8,000 mAh vs 6,650 mAh
Reasons to pick the Redmi Pad SE 8.7
- Stronger display score: 38 vs 20
- Stronger portability score: 68 vs 20
- 66% lower weight: 373 g vs 1,083 g
- 27% higher Pixel density: 179 ppi vs 141 ppi
- 13% lower thickness: 8.8 mm vs 10.1 mm
Display
| Spec | Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) | Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 15.6 ″+79% | 8.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1340x800 |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | 179 ppi+27% |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) | Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Unisoc T620 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| AnTuTu | — | 351,869Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 144,841Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 27,345Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 84,310Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 95,373Bottom 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 403Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 1,449Bottom 6% |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage options | 128GB (microSD up to 512GB) | 64GB / 128GB + microSD |
Battery
| Spec | Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) | Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 8,000 mAh+20% | 6,650 mAh |
| Charging | 18 W | 18 W |
Design
| Spec | Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) | Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1,083 g | 373 g+66% |
| Thickness | 10.1 mm | 8.8 mm+13% |
| Material | — | Plastic |
Camera
| Spec | Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) | Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Front camera | 8 MP+60% | 5 MP |
Connectivity
| Spec | Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) | Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 |
| Cellular | None (Wi-Fi only) | 4G LTE optional |
| USB | 1x USB-C (USB 2.0) | USB-C 2.0 |
Features
| Spec | Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) | Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Speakers | Quad speakers | Dual stereo (Dolby Atmos) |
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 14 (HyperOS) |
Related comparisons
Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)vs Teclast P35VSIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)vs Fire HD 8 (2024)VSIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)vs Lenovo Tab (2025)VSIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)vs Asus ZenPad 10VSRedmi Pad SE 8.7vs Lenovo Tab M11VSRedmi Pad SE 8.7vs Tecno Megapad SE 2VSRedmi Pad SE 8.7vs Lenovo X11AVSRedmi Pad SE 8.7vs Honor Pad X8aVS