Skip to content
InnoReviews

Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) vs Teclast P35

VS
WINNER
Teclast P35
24.9Inno Score
20Performance20
20Display—
31.7Battery20
20Portability55.6
31.2Features20.8
5 spec wins — Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)2 spec wins — Teclast P35

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) scores 24 against 24.9 for Teclast P35. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Teclast P35 edges ahead in portability, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)

  • Stronger battery score: 32 vs 20
  • Stronger features score: 31 vs 21
  • 300% higher Front camera: 8 MP vs 2 MP
  • 60% higher Rear camera: 8 MP vs 5 MP
  • 54% higher Screen size: 15.6 ″ vs 10.1 ″

Reasons to pick the Teclast P35

  • Stronger portability score: 56 vs 20
  • 52% lower weight: 520 g vs 1,083 g

Display

Display comparison: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) versus Teclast P35
SpecIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)Teclast P35
Screen size15.6 ″+54%10.1 ″
Panel typeLCDIPS LCD
Resolution1920x10801280 x 800
Pixel density141 ppi—

Performance

Performance comparison: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) versus Teclast P35
SpecIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)Teclast P35
ChipsetUnisoc T620Unisoc T7200
RAM4 GB+33%3 GB
Storage options128GB (microSD up to 512GB)32GB

Battery

Battery comparison: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) versus Teclast P35
SpecIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)Teclast P35
Capacity8,000 mAh+33%6,000 mAh
Charging18 W—

Design

Design comparison: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) versus Teclast P35
SpecIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)Teclast P35
Weight1,083 g520 g+52%
Thickness10.1 mm9.9 mm+2%

Camera

Camera comparison: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) versus Teclast P35
SpecIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)Teclast P35
Rear camera8 MP+60%5 MP
Front camera8 MP+300%2 MP

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) versus Teclast P35
SpecIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)Teclast P35
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Dual-band Wi-Fi (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Bluetooth5.0Bluetooth 5.0
CellularNone (Wi-Fi only)—
USB1x USB-C (USB 2.0)USB-C

Features

Features comparison: Iris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H) versus Teclast P35
SpecIris Ohyama LUCA 15.6-inch Wireless Charging Tablet (TM15F1Q74-V1H)Teclast P35
SpeakersQuad speakersDual speakers
Operating systemAndroid 16Android 16 Go

Related comparisons

Try another matchup