Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Processor N150 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

WINNER
Intel Processor N150
34.1Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
33.9Inno Score
29.5Single-core25.9
22.8Multi-core23.8
82.2Efficiencyspec-based73.3
22.9iGPU—
27.6Platformspec-based31.1
2 spec wins — Intel Processor N1507 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Intel Processor N150 scores 34.1 against 33.9 for Qualcomm Snapdragon C. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Intel Processor N150 edges ahead in single-core, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Processor N150

  • Stronger single-core score: 30 vs 26
  • 20% higher Boost clock: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

  • 100% higher cores: 8 vs 4
  • 100% higher threads: 8 vs 4
  • 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm
  • 19% higher PassMark (single thread): 2,255 vs 1,892
  • 17% higher PassMark: 6,264 vs 5,344

General

General comparison: Intel Processor N150 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor N150Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20252026
Process10 nm6 nm+40%
Base TDP6 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Processor N150 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor N150Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores48+100%
Performance cores0—
Efficiency cores4—
Threads48+100%
Boost clock3.6 GHz+20%3 GHz
L3 cache6 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Processor N150 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor N150Qualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Graphics (24 EU)Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock1,000 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Processor N150 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor N150Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800LPDDR5/X-6400 / LPDDR4X-4200
Max memory16 GB16 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Processor N150 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor N150Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)1,218+3%Bottom 2%1,181Bottom 2%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,849Bottom 2%3,213+13%Bottom 3%
Cinebench R23 (single)912Bottom 4%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)2,494Bottom 3%—
PassMark5,344Bottom 4%6,264+17%Bottom 6%
PassMark (single thread)1,892Bottom 4%2,255+19%Bottom 8%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)342Bottom 3%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup