Skip to content
InnoReviews

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) vs Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)

WINNER
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
62Inno Score
VS
61.8chipPerformancespec-based57.1
85.9Graphics—
56.4Displayspec-based58
86.7Batteryspec-based73.3
20Portabilityspec-based—
4 spec wins — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)1 spec wins — Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) scores 62 against 61.7 for Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen). Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)

  • 100% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 100% higher storage: 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • 33% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 24 GB
  • 13% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 80 Wh

Reasons to pick the Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)

  • 109% higher Peak brightness: 1,100 nits vs 526 nits

Display

Display comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS (WQXGA, G-SYNC)OLED
Resolution2560x16002880x1800
Refresh rate240 Hz+100%120 Hz
Peak brightness526 nits1,100 nits+109%

Performance

Performance comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
ProcessorIntel Core i9-14900HXAMD Ryzen 7 255
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop (140W)AMD Radeon 780M (integrated)
RAM32 GB+33%24 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5
Storage2,048 GB+100%1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD (2x M.2 slots, RAID 0)NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)12,516Top 48%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Capacity90 Wh+13%80 Wh

Design

Design comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Weight2.8 kg—
Thickness27.9 mm—
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic base—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Ports2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C, DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, 2.5G Ethernet, microSD, 3.5mm combo jack2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 2x full-function USB-C, HDMI, 3.5mm audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (Intel Killer)—
Bluetooth5.3—
Webcam720p (1080p optional)—
BiometricsNo fingerprint readerFace recognition

Software

Software comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup