Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
62Inno Score
VS
51.3chipPerformancespec-based57.1
85.9Graphics—
55Displayspec-based58
86.7Batteryspec-based73.3
42.5Portabilityspec-based—
2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)1 spec wins — Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 62 against 61.7 for Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen). Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 13% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 80 Wh

Reasons to pick the Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)

  • 50% higher RAM: 24 GB vs 16 GB

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-SyncOLED
Resolution2560x16002880x1800
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness—1,100 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 9 7940HXAMD Ryzen 7 255
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)AMD Radeon 780M (integrated)
RAM16 GB24 GB+50%
RAM typeDDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)DDR5
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)12,516Top 48%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Capacity90 Wh+13%80 Wh
Charging280 W—

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Weight2.27 kg—
Thickness22.1 mm—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 2x full-function USB-C, HDMI, 3.5mm audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)—
Bluetooth5.2—
Webcam720p HD—
Biometrics—Face recognition

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Ryzen)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup