Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) vs ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM
51.1Performance47.1
85Graphics85
31.8Displayspec-based41.5
94.7Batteryspec-based60
32.7Portabilityspec-based69.8
4 spec wins — Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)6 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) scores 56.8 against 56.9 for ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)
- Stronger performance score: 51 vs 47
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 32% higher capacity: 96 Wh vs 73 Wh
- 14% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 14 ″
- Lower launch price: $1,150 vs $1,700
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM
- 43% lower weight: 1.46 kg vs 2.57 kg
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 33% higher Peak brightness: 400 nits vs 300 nits
- 12% lower thickness: 19.9 mm vs 22.7 mm
- 11% higher charging: 200 W vs 180 W
Display
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″+14% | 14 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS-level, anti-glare (100% sRGB, G-Sync) |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 2560x1600 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz+38% |
| Peak brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits+33% |
Performance
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core 7 240H | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7) |
| RAM | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM) | LPDDR5X-7500 (soldered) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots) | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD (2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,699Bottom 36% | 2,878+7%Top 38% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 13,815+9%Top 49% | 12,693Bottom 42% |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU) | 12,021Bottom 31% | 12,021Bottom 31% |
Battery
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 96 Wh+32% | 73 Wh |
| Web browsing endurance | — | 11.2 h |
| Charging | 180 W | 200 W+11% |
Design
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.57 kg | 1.46 kg+43% |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | 19.9 mm+12% |
| Material | Anodized aluminum lid, plastic deck and base, magnesium alloy internal frame | Aluminum lid and bottom case (MIL-STD-810H tested) |
Connectivity
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (one with DisplayPort 1.4, one with Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headset jack | 1x USB4 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery, 40Gbps), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, 10Gbps), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, microSD reader (UHS-II), 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Webcam | 720p | 1080p FHD with IR |
| Biometrics | None | IR camera for Windows Hello face login |
Software
| Spec | Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14VSAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 3VSAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61VSAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)vs Acer Nitro V 14 AI ANV14-62VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs Apple MacBook Air 15 (M4)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs Apple MacBook Air 15 (M5)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs Dell 16 PremiumVSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs Razer Blade 14 (2025)VS