Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 vs HP OMEN 16 (2025)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
56.5Inno Score
VS
HP OMEN 16 (2025)
56.4Inno Score
50Performancechip53.4
87.6Graphics85
44.1Displayspec-based41.5
73.3Batteryspec-based77.3
39.8Portabilityspec-based33.3
6 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA6081 spec wins — HP OMEN 16 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 scores 56.5 against 56.4 for HP OMEN 16 (2025). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 edges ahead in graphics, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608

  • 33% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 24 GB
  • 20% higher Peak brightness: 480 nits vs 400 nits
  • 14% higher 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU): 13,644 vs 12,021

Reasons to pick the HP OMEN 16 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 53 vs 50

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus HP OMEN 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608HP OMEN 16 (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync (100% sRGB)IPS
Resolution2560x16001920x1200
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness480 nits+20%400 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus HP OMEN 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608HP OMEN 16 (2025)
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 260Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU
RAM32 GB+33%24 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)DDR5-5600 (2 SODIMM slots)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus HP OMEN 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608HP OMEN 16 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,673Bottom 35%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,299Bottom 48%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)13,644+14%Top 31%12,021Bottom 31%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus HP OMEN 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608HP OMEN 16 (2025)
Capacity90 Wh+8%83 Wh
Web browsing endurance13 h—
Charging240 W+4%230 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus HP OMEN 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608HP OMEN 16 (2025)
Weight2.2 kg+9%2.43 kg
Thickness25.7 mm25.4 mm+1%
MaterialPlastic body with aluminum lidPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus HP OMEN 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608HP OMEN 16 (2025)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, one with G-SYNC and power delivery), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack1x USB-C (10Gbps, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4), 1x USB-A (10Gbps), 2x USB-A (5Gbps), HDMI 2.1, RJ-45 Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headphone/mic combo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.3
WebcamFHD with IR1080p webcam with privacy shutter
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus HP OMEN 16 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608HP OMEN 16 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup