Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 vs ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
61.4chipPerformance50
61chipGraphics87.6
38.4Displayspec-based44.1
53.3Batteryspec-based73.3
73.1Portabilityspec-based39.8
3 spec wins — Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-733 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 scores 56.6 against 56.5 for ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 edges ahead in performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73
- Stronger performance score: 61 vs 50
- 35% lower thickness: 16.6 mm vs 25.7 mm
- 32% lower weight: 1.5 kg vs 2.2 kg
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
- Stronger graphics score: 88 vs 61
- 140% higher charging: 240 W vs 100 W
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 38% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 65 Wh
Display
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync (100% sRGB) |
| Resolution | 2880x1800 | 2560x1600 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz+38% |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits+4% | 480 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | AMD Ryzen 7 260 |
| Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W) |
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD | PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,673Bottom 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 13,299Bottom 48% |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU) | — | 13,644Top 31% |
Battery
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 65 Wh | 90 Wh+38% |
| Web browsing endurance | — | 13 h |
| Charging | 100 W | 240 W+140% |
Design
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.5 kg+32% | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 16.6 mm+35% | 25.7 mm |
| Material | — | Plastic body with aluminum lid |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C), 2x USB-A 5Gbps, HDMI 2.1, microSD card reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, one with G-SYNC and power delivery), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| Webcam | 1440p IR webcam with privacy shutter | FHD with IR |
| Biometrics | — | IR face (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73 | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
Acer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73vs Dell XPS 13 (9350)VSAcer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73vs Dell Pro 13 PremiumVSAcer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73vs HONOR WIN H7VSAcer Swift Go 16 SFG16-73vs MSI Raider A18 HX A9WVSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 Aura EditionVSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs Dell XPS 13 (9350)VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs Acer Nitro 18 AI AN18-61VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs HP OMEN 16 (2025)VS