Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
50.3Inno Score
VS
MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
42.5Inno Score
44Performance37.4
37.4Display48
86.7Battery38
35.9Portability50.2
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6073 spec wins — MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 42.5, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+49) and performance (+7). MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger performance score: 44 vs 37
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 38
  • 100% higher charging: 240 W vs 120 W
  • 68% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 54 Wh
  • 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz

Reasons to pick the MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V

  • Stronger display score: 48 vs 37
  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 36
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 19% lower thickness: 22.9 mm vs 28.2 mm
  • 13% lower weight: 1.98 kg vs 2.27 kg

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
Screen size16 ″+3%15.6 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)IPS-level
Resolution1920x12001920 x 1080
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,130Bottom 2%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,296Bottom 22%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
Capacity90 Wh+68%54 Wh
Charging240 W+100%120 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
Weight2.27 kg1.98 kg+13%
Thickness28.2 mm22.9 mm+19%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseAluminum cover, translucent chassis

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio1x USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen1, HDMI 2.1, RJ45, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
Webcam720p HD720p HD
BiometricsNone—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Cyborg 15 AI A1V
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup