Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) vs MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
64.1Inno Score
VS
MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
64Inno Score
63.5chipPerformance60.9
55Display80
86.7Battery86.7
50.3Portability20
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)2 spec wins — MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) scores 64.1 against 64 for MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) edges ahead in portability and performance, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 20
  • 40% lower thickness: 17.9 mm vs 29.9 mm
  • 29% lower weight: 2.2 kg vs 3.1 kg
  • 17% higher charging: 280 W vs 240 W

Reasons to pick the MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW

  • Stronger display score: 80 vs 55
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 13% higher Screen size: 18 ″ vs 16 ″

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
Screen size16 ″18 ″+13%
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-SyncIPS-level
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7)
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)DDR5-5600 (2 slots, up to 96GB)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,856Top 43%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—18,984Top 16%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Charging280 W+17%240 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
Weight2.2 kg+29%3.1 kg
Thickness17.9 mm+40%29.9 mm
MaterialAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H testedPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
Ports1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort, PD 3.0), 3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera720p30
BiometricsIR camera with Windows Hello face recognition—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Crosshair 18 HX AI A2XW
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup