Blackview FORT 200 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
30.6chipPerformance27.1
40.2Display36.6
42.8Camera30.1
50.5Battery55.7
33.3Features65.3
8 spec wins — Blackview FORT 2006 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Blackview FORT 200 scores 39.2 against 39.1 for Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Blackview FORT 200 edges ahead in camera and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Blackview FORT 200
- Stronger performance score: 31 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 40 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 43 vs 30
- 285% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 51
- Stronger features score: 65 vs 33
- 31% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 11.5 mm
- 25% lower weight: 200 g vs 268 g
- 16% higher screen-to-body: 85.2 % vs 73.7 %
Display
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″+1% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi+3% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 800 nits+14% |
| Screen-to-body | 73.7 % | 85.2 %+16% |
Performance
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| AnTuTu | — | 509,232Bottom 1% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 210,242Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,774Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,272Bottom 1% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,944Bottom 1% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 740Bottom 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,050Bottom 21% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 5 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | — | No |
Battery
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W+32% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 268 g | 200 g+25% |
| Thickness | 11.5 mm | 7.9 mm+31% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP54 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | — | No |
Software
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (DokeOS 5.0) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Blackview FORT 200vs Doogee Fire 7 ProVSBlackview FORT 200vs Doogee Fire 7 UltraVSBlackview FORT 200vs HONOR X9c SmartVSBlackview FORT 200vs HONOR X7b 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Infinix HOT 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Doogee Fire 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Doogee Fire 7 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs HONOR X9c SmartVS