Blackview FORT 200 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
30.6chipPerformance27.1
40.2Display36.6
42.8Camera30.1
50.5Battery55.7
33.3Features65.3
8 spec wins — Blackview FORT 2006 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Blackview FORT 200 scores 39.2 against 39.1 for Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Blackview FORT 200 edges ahead in camera and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Blackview FORT 200
- Stronger performance score: 31 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 40 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 43 vs 30
- 285% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 51
- Stronger features score: 65 vs 33
- 31% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 11.5 mm
- 25% lower weight: 200 g vs 268 g
- 16% higher screen-to-body: 85.2 % vs 73.7 %
Display
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″+1% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi+3% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 800 nits+14% |
| Screen-to-body | 73.7 % | 85.2 %+16% |
Performance
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| AnTuTu | — | 509,232Bottom 1% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 210,242Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,774Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,272Bottom 1% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,944Bottom 1% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 740Bottom 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,050Bottom 21% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 5 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | — | No |
Battery
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W+32% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 268 g | 200 g+25% |
| Thickness | 11.5 mm | 7.9 mm+31% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP54 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | — | No |
Software
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (DokeOS 5.0) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | Blackview FORT 200 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Blackview FORT 200vs Doogee Fire 7 ProVSBlackview FORT 200vs Doogee Fire 7 UltraVSBlackview FORT 200vs HONOR X9c SmartVSBlackview FORT 200vs HONOR X7b 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Cubot P90VSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Infinix HOT 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs POCO X3 NFCVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Doogee Fire 7 ProVS