Skip to content
InnoReviews

Cubot P90 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

Cubot P90
39.1Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
39.1Inno Score
30.6chipPerformance27.1
47.5Display36.6
32.3Camera30.1
39.8Battery55.7
60Features65.3
7 spec wins — Cubot P907 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Cubot P90 scores 39.1 against 39.1 for Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Cubot P90 edges ahead in display and performance, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Cubot P90

  • Stronger performance score: 31 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 48 vs 37
  • 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 33% higher Refresh rate: 120 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

  • Stronger battery score: 56 vs 40
  • Stronger features score: 65 vs 60
  • 48% higher Pixel density: 385 ppi vs 260 ppi
  • 39% higher Wired charging: 25 W vs 18 W
  • Has 5G — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Screen size6.88 ″+3%6.7 ″
Panel typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Resolution720x16401080x2340
Pixel density260 ppi385 ppi+48%
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness—800 nits
Screen-to-body83.5 %85.2 %+2%

Performance

Performance comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu—509,232Bottom 1%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—210,242Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—43,774Bottom 2%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—110,272Bottom 1%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—144,944Bottom 1%
Geekbench 6 (single)—740Bottom 16%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,050Bottom 21%
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options128/256GB128/256GB

Camera

Camera comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperture—f/1.8
Ultra-wide5 MP5 MP
Optical zoom—1 x
Max video—1080p@30fps
Front camera16 MP+23%13 MP
OIS—No

Battery

Battery comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Capacity5,100 mAh+2%5,000 mAh
Wired charging18 W25 W+39%
Wireless charging—0 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Weight209 g200 g+4%
Thickness8.6 mm7.9 mm+8%
IP rating—IP54
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 (802.11a/b/g/n/ac)Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—6 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Cubot P90 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
SpecCubot P90Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup