Skip to content
InnoReviews

HONOR Magic9 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

HONOR Magic9
87.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
87.8Inno Score
92.9chipPerformance92.4
80.2Display82.3
84.2Camera84.6
88.7Battery91.5
86.7Features84
5 spec wins — HONOR Magic96 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: HONOR Magic9 scores 87.1 against 87.8 for Vivo X300 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Vivo X300 Ultra edges ahead in battery and display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the HONOR Magic9

  • 122% higher Peak brightness: 10,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
  • 25% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 40 W
  • 21% higher capacity: 8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 10% higher Front camera: 55 MP vs 50 MP
  • 10% lower weight: 209 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 25% higher Wired charging: 100 W vs 80 W
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 11% higher Pixel density: 510 ppi vs 461 ppi

Display

Display comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.37 ″6.82 ″+7%
Panel typeOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1236x26641440x3168
Pixel density461 ppi510 ppi+11%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness10,000 nits+122%4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—3,770,706Top 5%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,029,149Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,375,957Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—516,143Top 2%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—849,457Top 4%
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 2%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256GB/512GB/1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto200 MP200 MP
Optical zoom3.5 x3.7 x+6%
Max video4K@120fps8K@30fps
Front camera55 MP+10%50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
Capacity8,000 mAh+21%6,600 mAh
Wired charging80 W100 W+25%
Wireless charging50 W+25%40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
Weight209 g+10%232 g
Thickness8.5 mm8.2 mm+4%
IP ratingIP68/IP69/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 17 (MagicOS 11)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: HONOR Magic9 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecHONOR Magic9Vivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup