iPhone Air vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
76.8Performancechip79.3
64.7Display43.7
44.7Camera55.7
46.9Battery60.8
73.3Features60
6 spec wins — iPhone Air6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: iPhone Air scores 61.6 against 61.8 for Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges ahead in battery and camera, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the iPhone Air
- Stronger display score: 65 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 88% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits
- 80% higher Front camera: 18 MP vs 10 MP
- 71% higher Pixel density: 460 ppi vs 269 ppi
- Lower launch price: $999 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 45
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 47
- 317% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 48 MP
- 125% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 20 W
- 78% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 3,149 mAh
Display
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.5 ″ | 10 ″+54% |
| Panel type | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1260x2736 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+71% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+88% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 89.9 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Apple A19 Pro | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 1,709,647Bottom 47% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 404,628Bottom 34% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 617,312Top 49% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 236,074Bottom 42% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 451,633Bottom 48% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,775Top 2% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,497Top 12% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 61 %Bottom 27% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | NVMe | — |
Camera
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP+317% |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | 3 x+50% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 18 MP+80% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3,149 mAh | 5,600 mAh+78% |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 45 W+125% |
| Wireless charging | 20 W+33% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.7 h | — |
Design
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 165 g+47% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 5.6 mm+56% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Titanium | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | iOS 26 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
iPhone Airvs OPPO K13 Turbo ProVSiPhone Airvs realme 15 5GVSiPhone Airvs Ulefone Armor 28 UltraVSiPhone Airvs vivo S19 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Google Pixel 9 Pro XLVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs vivo S20VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Google Pixel 11VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Xiaomi Mi 11 UltraVS