Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs vivo S20

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
61.8Inno Score
VS
vivo S20
61.8Inno Score
79.3chipPerformancechip39.5
43.7Display79.8
55.7Camera49.8
60.8Battery76.9
60Features86.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold7 spec wins — vivo S20

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 61.8 against 61.8 for vivo S20. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges ahead in performance and camera, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 79 vs 40
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 50
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 50% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.67 ″
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP

Reasons to pick the vivo S20

  • Stronger display score: 80 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
  • 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
  • 213% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 1,600 nits

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
Screen size10 ″+50%6.67 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
Resolution2160x15841260x2800
Pixel density269 ppi460 ppi+71%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits5,000 nits+213%
Screen-to-body—94.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB256GB/512GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.88
Ultra-wide12 MP+50%8 MP
Telephoto10 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Max video—4K
Front camera10 MP50 MP+400%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
Capacity5,600 mAh6,500 mAh+16%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
Weight309 g187 g+39%
Thickness12.9 mm7.2 mm+44%
IP ratingIP48IP64
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus vivo S20
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvivo S20
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup