Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
23.1Performance77.6
60.2Display59.2
54.8Camera42.1
47.2Battery59.7
100Features94.7
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 wins this phone face-off, 64.9 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+54) and battery (+13). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 164% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 100 % vs 38 %
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,200
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
- Stronger performance score: 78 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 60 vs 47
- 213% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,466 vs 3,343
- 169% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,977 vs 1,108
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2520 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+3% | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 87.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, Canada and China) |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,477,554 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 2,977+169%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 10,466+213%Top 5% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %+164%Top 3% | 38 %Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh+12% | 4,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 14.2 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g | 180 g+4% |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+45% | 13.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs realme 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 70 FusionVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 50 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Huawei nova 14 UltraVS