Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
77Performance77.6
85.3Display59.2
58.6Camera42.1
77.3Battery59.7
73.3Features94.7
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 64.9, pulling ahead mainly in display (+26) and battery (+18). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 60
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 21% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,466 vs 8,651
- 10% lower weight: 180 g vs 199 g
- Lower launch price: $1,200 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+1% | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2520 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+16% | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+67% | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 87.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, Canada and China) |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+15% | 2,477,554 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 2,977+1%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 10,466+21%Top 5% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 38 %Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+16% | 4,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+16% | 14.2 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g+10% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+45% | 13.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs realme 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 70 FusionVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 50 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Huawei nova 14 UltraVS