Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
77Performance86.1
85.3Display61.6
58.6Camera50.2
77.3Battery67.5
73.3Features94.7
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 71.2, pulling ahead mainly in display (+24) and battery (+10). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 62
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 50
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 68
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 67% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,000 nits
- Lower launch price: $1,500 vs $1,900
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
- Stronger performance score: 86 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 23% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,619 vs 8,651
- 19% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,528 vs 2,956
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″ | 7.6 ″+9% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2448x1848 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+14% | 404 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+67% | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 89.6 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | 2,947,517+4% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 3,528+19%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 10,619+23%Top 4% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 53 %Bottom 11% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh+4% | 4,800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+50% | 20 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+20% | 13.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+1% | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+26% | 9.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Samsung Galaxy S26+VSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs iQOO Z10 TurboVS