Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Vivo X300 Pro
77Performance86.9
85.3Display74.3
58.6Camera75.8
77.3Battery83.3
73.3Features84
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)8 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 74.7, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+17) and features (+11). Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 74
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 29% higher Active use endurance: 16.5 h vs 12.8 h
- 12% lower weight: 199 g vs 226 g
- 11% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 77
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 59
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 77
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
- 67% higher OS update pledge: 5 years vs 3 years
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+2% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+11% | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 91.6 %+5% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | 3,533,222+24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | 3,473+17%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | 10,264+19%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,510 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 40 W+33% |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+29% | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+12% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+10% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS