OPPO Reno16 FS 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6
21.8Performance47.9
55Display56.9
61.4Camera44.1
66.6Battery45.5
100Features94.7
6 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 FS 5G8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: OPPO Reno16 FS 5G scores 53.1 against 53.1 for Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6. Pick by the categories that matter to you — OPPO Reno16 FS 5G edges ahead in battery and camera, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 FS 5G
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 67 vs 46
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6
- Stronger performance score: 48 vs 22
- 121% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,354 vs 2,872
- 106% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,072 vs 1,005
- 86% higher Peak brightness: 2,600 nits vs 1,400 nits
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.57 ″ | 6.7 ″+2% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2372x1080 | 1080x2640 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 426 ppi+7% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 2,600 nits+86% |
| Screen-to-body | 92.8 %+8% | 85.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,005Bottom 33% | 2,072+106%Top 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,872Bottom 34% | 6,354+121%Top 33% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 38 %Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x+75% | 2 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,500 mAh+63% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 10 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 196 g | 187 g+5% |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm+42% | 14.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69/IP69K | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs Blackview BL9000VSOPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs HONOR X70 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs OPPO F35 Pro 5GVSOPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs POCO M7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 6vs Blackview BL9000VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 6vs HONOR X70 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 6vs OPPO F35 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 6vs POCO M7 Pro 5GVS