Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F3 vs Vivo X300 Pro

POCO F3

Xiaomi

POCO F3

$349

41.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
34.7Performance86.9
47.5Display74.3
31.3Camera75.8
43.3Battery83.3
65.3Features84
2 spec wins — POCO F314 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 41.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+52) and camera (+45). POCO F3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F3

  • 13% lower weight: 196 g vs 226 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 35
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 48
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 31
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 43
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 65

Display

Display comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.67 ″6.78 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801260x2800
Pixel density395 ppi452 ppi+14%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,300 nits4,500 nits+246%
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 870MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared990,057Bottom 39%3,533,222
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)378,834Bottom 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)171,089Bottom 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)173,146Bottom 38%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)266,988Bottom 33%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,050Bottom 37%3,473+231%Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,000Bottom 40%10,264+242%Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB / 256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
Main camera48 MP50 MP+4%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera20 MP50 MP+150%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
Capacity4,520 mAh6,510 mAh+44%
Wired charging33 W90 W+173%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
Weight196 g+13%226 g
Thickness7.8 mm+2%8 mm
IP ratingIP53IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 11 (MIUI 12)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F3 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F3Vivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup