Skip to content
InnoReviews

Sharp AQUOS R11 vs Vivo X300 Pro

Sharp AQUOS R11
60.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
46.7Performance86.9
76.2Display74.3
68.3Camera75.8
50.1Battery83.3
73.3Features84
5 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R1111 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+40) and battery (+33). Sharp AQUOS R11 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11

  • 100% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 14% lower weight: 195 g vs 226 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 47
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 68
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 50
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
  • 419% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 39 MP

Display

Display comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.5 ″6.78 ″+4%
Panel typeLTPO Pro IGZO OLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401260x2800
Pixel density396 ppi452 ppi+14%
Refresh rate240 Hz+100%120 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits4,500 nits+25%
Screen-to-body89.8 %91.6 %+2%

Performance

Performance comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,533,222
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,473Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,264Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
Main camera50 MP+1%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.57
Ultra-wide50 MP+1%50 MP
Telephoto39 MP200 MP+419%
Optical zoom2.9 x3.7 x+28%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+1%50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,100 mAh6,510 mAh+28%
Wired charging36 W90 W+150%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
Weight195 g+14%226 g
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm+10%
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Sharp AQUOS R11vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FEVSSharp AQUOS R11vs HONOR 200 ProVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro MaxVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Huawei Pura 80VSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS

Try another matchup