Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Vivo X200 Pro

vivo

Vivo X200 Pro

$1,099

75.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
81.4Inno Score
74.5Performance87.6
73.2Display67.4
72Camera77
79.9Battery81
78.7Features100
2 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro7 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 81.4 to 75.2, pulling ahead mainly in features (+21) and performance (+13). Vivo X200 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro

  • Stronger display score: 73 vs 67
  • 29% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 75
  • Stronger camera score: 77 vs 72
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 79
  • 67% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 30 W
  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.9 ″+2%
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1260x28001200x2608
Pixel density452 ppi+9%416 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+29%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body90.3 %92.3 %+2%

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared2,550,0003,600,724Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,032,276Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,345,109Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—495,988Top 2%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—727,351Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (single)2,800Top 19%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,600Top 16%—
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.57f/1.67
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto200 MP200 MP
Optical zoom3.7 x4.3 x+16%
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Capacity6,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W90 W
Wireless charging30 W50 W+67%
Active use endurance13 h—

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Weight223 g219 g+2%
Thickness8.5 mm8.3 mm+2%
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 15 (Funtouch OS 15)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X200 Pro versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecVivo X200 ProXiaomi 17 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup